Eric's Beijing Diary

Click for larger image.

Last Thursday I went to the National Museum with some friends and saw this chart on the wall showing the dynasties of China. Studying the history of China is useful in helping to understand what makes a dynasty rise and fall, because China has had so many of them. Before I came to China, and even after I arrived, I found that Chinese people were fond of saying that China had five thousand years of history. So I would ask them, "Who was the first emperor of China?"

Invariably the response was "Qin Shi Huang."

Then I would say, "Ok, if Qin Shi Huang was the first emperor China and the Qin Dynasty was a little over two thousand years ago, what did you guys do for the three thousand years?"

But the problem is that if you make the argument that China began with Qin Shi Huang, and is thus only a little more than two thousand years old, you have a problem. China is nothing if not Confucian, and Confucius lived in the sixth century BC, so that would bring the beginning of China back to at least 2600 years ago. But if you say that China began with Confucius, you also have a problem. Confucius never presented his ideas as new ideas. He always saw himself as restoring the Rites of Zhou established by the Duke of Zhou.

The Zhou Dynasty lasted longer than any other dynasty (790 years). That is remarkable. The chart pictured above is a bit confusing, because it does not explain that the Zhou Dynasty is actually divided into two segments, the Western Zhou and the Eastern Zhou. This chart shows the Western Zhou, but it doesn't tell you that the Eastern Zhou is actually composed of the two sub-parts that are listed here, the Spring and Autumn Period (during which Confucius lived and taught), and the Warring States Period.

Why is the Zhou Dynasty thus divided? My thinking is that the second part of the Zhou Dynasty (the Eastern Zhou, made up of the two sub-periods I mentioned) represents the decline of the Zhou Dynasty. It seems that Confucius saw this decline and tried to correct it by restoring the values of the first part of the Zhou Dynasty (shown here as the Western Zhou), with particular reference to his hero, the Duke of Zhou. The extent to which he succeeded can be measured by the extent to which China as China became an enduring society.

I don't want to go any further in that direction, because the treatment of Confucius and his influence on succeeding dynasties is far too big a subject to be dealt with here. Suffice it to say that, in my opinion, Chinese dynasties have risen as they have stayed true to those values, and have declined as they moved away from them.

One further note: In my opinion, it is a mistake to refer to Qin Shi Huang as the "first emperor of China," although this is a very common practice. It implies that there really was no Chinese society before Qin Shi Huang, and that China was just a disorganized rabble. That may be true politically, but not culturally. In fact, as you can see, there were many rulers of China before Qin Shi Huang, spanning hundreds of years.

So how did this come about--I mean Qin Shi Huang coming to be thought of as the first emperor of China when, in fact, there were many monarchs before him? People in China usually respond that he was the first emperor of the unified China. Maybe. But in my opinion, a big part of it is due to the way he stylized his name:

It is evident that whatever we think of Qin Shi Huang, he thought of himself as the first emperor of China (or at least the first one that mattered), he stylized his name to reflect that, and he managed to convince succeeding generations of Chinese people to view him in that light.

Not me. I think he had an exaggerated view of his own importance. Don't get me wrong. I don't say that Qin Shi Huang was not important. That would be going too far the other way. No study of China's history is complete without a visit to Xi'an to view the Terracotta soldiers--more than eight thousand of them--who were buried with Qin Shi Huang to protect him in the afterlife. His own body has never been exhumed. He had himself buried in a sea of mercury. He was an extraordinary person, and his influence is important to understand particularly in light of the fact that Mao, who did not encourage the reading of ancient history by the masses, was a prodigious student of history himself, and saw himself as the modern version of Qin Shi Huang.

But calling him the first emperor of China is going to far, I think. The roots of Chinese culture precede him by centuries, and endured his attempts to minimize them in much the same way that Confucian ideas have survived the attempts of the early Communists to wipe them out.

So where does this all end? If you want to know how old China as China really is, you must go back before Qin Shi Huang. Confucius? No, keep going, all the way back to the first half of the Zhou Dynasty. Search there and you will find what makes China China.

Comments

Labels: Confucius, Dynasties, Qin Shi Huang

Death. Cold, definite, and relentless. We try to put it out of our minds. We think of other things. We live our lives as mortals as if death will never come, yet we are so accustomed to the concept, that we never stop to realize how terribly unnatural it really is. Surely man was not created to die. Something must have gone terribly wrong.

But slowly, surely, it approaches. Dark. Unknown. History is full of man's efforts to nullify it's effects. One of the most astounding stories of one individual's attempts to conquer death is the story of the Qin Emperor. His name was Qin Shi Huang, and he lived in the third century before Christ. He was cold, calculating and ruthless. The tomb he ordered built for himself consumed the better part of four decades, and three quarters of a million laborers. It was discovered by farmers in 1974. The most dramatic part of this burial site is the presence of thousands of life-size warriors, arranged in full battle formation, set to guard the emperor in the afterlife. No one knows just how many there are. Rumor has it that he had himself buried in a sea of mercury. The actual tomb has never been excavated, so such wild stories cannot now be verified, but the mercury content of the soil around his tomb is very, very high, so there could be some truth to it.

Today I visited the site where the thousands of terracotta warriors are standing just as they have for two millennia. The site has been very well developed, and the tour can actually be done as a self-guided tour, because all the plaques contain well written explanations in English. I decided to take the youth hostel tour, because I lost a couple days in Urumqi, due to illness. I don't really have time to take a day to get oriented. As it was, it turned out to be a good decision, because there were others on the tour who had more knowledge than the young tour guide himself, most notably the art historian from Amsterdam (the guy who told me how good looking I was yesterday). The Terracotta Warriors display includes a "movie in the round" like at Disneyland. It's obviously designed for foreigners, because it is all in English, which makes me wonder what local people think of it.

This evening, I headed for the Muslim quarter. Compared to Kashgar, it is disappointing, because it is so completely commercialized. There is really no functioning Muslim life that I could see in Xi'an. But the Great Mosque is quite impressive. The mosque in Kashgar is much more Middle Eastern. It is a functioning mosque that is very much a part of the community. But the mosque here in Xi'an is impressive for another reason. It is just plain old. It was first set up in the Eighth Century. Surely it has been modified since then, but it still has to be the oldest wood structure I have ever seen. It is very, very Chinese. And the garden around the mosque exudes antiquity. When you go to the Mosque in Kashgar, you feel like you are visiting the main community center. When you go to mosque in Xi'an, you feel like you are going to a museum--and you are. They charge you 12 yuan just to look at it. Nevertheless, it is a very interesting piece of history.

Labels: Qin Shi Huang